Search all library resources

Results include

• Book (348)
• Journal/Periodical (14)
• Database (2)

1. Domestic Policy Discourse in the US and the UK in the 'New World Order'

   Maguire, Lori

   Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010.

   Other the end of the Cold War, many commentators expected a renewed emphasis on domestic policy as a result of this major change in foreign policy. Until the attacks of 11 September 2001, this is exactly what happened. The "new world order" in domestic terms, celebrated the triumph of capitalism and free markets. At this time, Milton Friedman's economic ideas were all the rage and Keynes completely out of fashion. The economic problems of the 1970s, in combination Other the manifest failure of ...With the end of the Cold War, many commentators expected a renewed emphasis on domestic policy as a result of this major change in foreign policy. Until the attacks of 11 September 2001, this is exactly what happened. The "new world order" in domestic terms, celebrated the triumph of capitalism and free markets. At this time, Milton Friedman's economic ideas were all the rage and Keynes completely out of fashion. The economic problems of the 1970s, in combination with the manifest failure of communist economies, had largely discredited the traditional notion of the Left and party rhetoric reflected this. Both the Democrats and Labour had begun in the 1980s (faced with the success of Reagan and Thatcher) a process of redefinition: people talked of "New Democrats" and "New Labour". During the campaign of 1992, Clinton insisted on the need for a "modern, mainstream agenda" and used key terms often associated with conservatism like "expansion of opportunity", "choice", "responsibility" and "reinventing government". Labour, especially after Tony Blair became leader in 1994, followed the same path.Both the Conservatives and the Republicans had pushed to the right in the late 1970s and continued this trend in the following years. Although their electoral fortunes varied, they increasingly found themselves divided between moderate and more rightwing members. In Britain this division focused on Europe while, in the US, it usually concerned social and ethical questions. By 2010, the Conservatives had attained some cohesion under David Cameron but, the Republicans were openly feuding.This book's originality lies in its scope, in its comparative aspect, and its inclusion of first person accounts as well as scholarly studies. In particular, the book includes one of the first major analyses of the health care debate from Clinton's failed attempt to the conclusion of Obama's successful one. Highly up to date and topical, it also discusses discourse related to the recent economic crisis, the so-called "Climategate" scandal, the UK elections of 2010, the gay rights debates in the US, "Islamophobia", and the Arizona immigration law.

   Online EBSCO Academic Comprehensive Collection

2. Reforms at risk : what happens after major policy changes are enacted

   Patashnik, Eric M.

   Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2008.

   "Reforms at Risk" is the first book to closely examine what happens to sweeping and seemingly successful policy reforms after they are passed. Most books focus on the politics of reform adoption, yet as Eric Patashnik shows here, the political struggle does not end when major reforms become enacted. Why do certain highly praised policy reforms endure while others are quietly reversed or eroded away? Patashnik peers into some of the most critical arenas of domestic-policy reform - including taxes, agricultural subsidies, airline deregulation, emissions trading, welfare state reform, and reform of government procurement - to identify the factors that enable reform measures to survive. He argues that the reforms that stick destroy an existing policy subsystem and reconfigure the political dynamic. Patashnik demonstrates that sustainable reforms create positive policy feedbacks, transform institutions, and often unleash the "creative destructiveness" of market forces." Reforms at Risk" debunks the argument that reforms inevitably fail because Congress is prey to special interests, and the book provides a more realistic portrait of the possibilities and limits of positive change in American government. It is essential reading for scholars and practitioners of U.S. politics and public policy, offering practical lessons for anyone who wants to ensure that hard-fought reform victories survive.

3. Federal rulemaking : past reviews and emerging trends suggest issues that merit Congressional attention : testimony before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives

   Mihm, J. Christopher

   [Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Government Accountability Office, [2005]

   Online purl.fdlp.gov

Your search also found 2 topic specific databases.